[bksvol-discuss] Re: Things that work for me
- From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:44:04 -0500
I primarily use the Epson 1660, but also have an Epson 5200, which is fairly
accurate, but it's way way way slower. On Kurzweil's suggested scanner list
they are both only ranked as "fast", so I'd love to see one they rank as
"very fast".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allison" <alwaysallie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Things that work for me
> I'm impressed. What kind of scanner are you using?
>
> Allison
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 3:54 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Things that work for me
>
>
> > Oh man, I use mine with a delay of one second and still have enough time
> > to
> > flip the page while the scanner is returning to the top of the page.
With
> > this quick little monster I can pump out about 400 pages an hour.
> > It's really accurate too.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pam Quinn" <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 3:47 PM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Things that work for me
> >
> >
> >> Slow your scanner down to four seconds? Wow. The default is five I
> >> think, and I usually set mine to six.
> >> Pam
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
