I agree, and that seems to be the general consensus. I don't know why people submit in txt, but maybe bookshare can find a way to convert all txt to rtf before putting the book on the download list. The request,nay rules, I think, has always been for submissions to be in rtf. It may be that some people don't have that capability. Cindy --- Rui Cabral <rui@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > regarding .txt files. > > I ran a test using word 2003 and no it did not > retain pagebreaks in .txt > format. > > I know k1k retains them and am fairly confident that > at least the last > couple of versions of openbook do as well. > > Beyond that i can't comment. > What i would like to know is, what is the compelling > reason to submit in > .txt since an rtf is only 20 to 40% bigger depending > on how much formatting > is preserved? > > Even for someone using a dialup connection, this > should not present a > substancial burier to submission and or validation. > > > -- Rui > Bookshare.org Unofficial Volunteer Scanning Page > http://members.cox.net/booksharescans > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <socly@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 1:13 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: So what did we decide? > > > > The problem, Rui, seems to be that the hard page > breaks aren't retained in > txt files. I have no problem putting them in, but > when I tried putting them > into a txt file I was validating, when I openedit > again to work on after > having saved it, with hard breaks and italics where > they were supposed to > be, neither was retained. Have you seen txt files > with hard page breaks? > Have you yourself been able to validate one and put > in hard breaks that are > retained? Maybe it's just my machine. I have a > suspicion that, though I'm > working, or think I'm working, on the txt document, > the machine might > automaically be using Word, though it doesn't say so > --it says plain text. > If I used something other than Text Only, such as > Text with Line Breaks or > MS DOS Text or MS-DOS Text wiht Line Breaks, or > Unicode Text, would that > make a difference? I thought when I asked once a > while ago I was told to use > the Text Only, but maybe that's the problem. I can't > remember if I tried any > of the others recently > > , although I did the very first time and it > didn't make a difference -- > but that was when I'd validated in word and > converted back. > > > > Cindy > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Find what you are looking for with the Lycos > Yellow Pages > > > http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10 > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com