[bksvol-discuss] Re: So what did we decide?
- From: "Rui Cabral" <rui@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:22:05 -0500
hi:
if a validater was checking for sequential page #s, they could also insert
the proper page breaks. (assuming they were using a program that saved txt
page breaks, like k1k, openbook, etc.
Let me debunk this myth, you do not have to read a book cover to cover to
insert the proper breaks.. (i have done it 4 or 5 times) but i use k1k.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: So what did we decide?
> But it wouldn't be difficult for a validator to put
> them in, if he/she were reading the book. If the
> validator were just going to spell-check and check for
> sequential page numbers, then it wouldn'y work, of
> course.
>
> Cindy
>
> --- Rui Cabral <rui@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> > rtf is a standard format, anyone who is using, word,
> > wordpad, k1k, openbook,
> > and probablly almost anything has the ability to
> > submit in rtf.
> >
> > Having bookshare automate the conversion on their
> > end would probably not
> > achieve the purpose, because by then the pagebreaks
> > would have been already
> > stripped by the original .txt so the resulting rtfs
> > would also have no
> > pagebreaks.
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Rui
> > Bookshare.org Unofficial Volunteer Scanning Page
> > http://members.cox.net/booksharescans
> >
> > --
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
> www.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
