You always have the option of returning it to the cue. Of course adding a comment that the pagination is messed up. Someone else with lots of time and patience might really like to fix up this book.
What I usually do with a book that I downloaded and discover something about it that is bad, but fixable, is to check the book history page. If several folks have already tried and returned it, then I reject it, but, if I'm the first or second proof reader to check it out, I return it.
I really wish the folks using Kurzweil v11 would learn to set their settings properly. A book with messed up pagination is a bear to fix, if it is fixable at all.
Just my thoughts. Bob----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:20 AMSubject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Rejecting a great scan for too many page breaks
Unless you have extreme amounts of patience, I vote to reject.Adding extra page breaks is a feature os k1000 if improperly configured in version 11. Be sure to mention this in your note in case the submitter needs to fix such settings.E. At 03:00 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:Is it bad to reject a book for messed up pagination? I have a book that's supposed to be 250 pages but it's 482 and I don't know where the extra page breaks are.To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxput the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.