Following the overwhelming consensus it was not a readability issue, I submitted it as was. I do have concerns that audio listeners, emergent readers and such will lose meaning (or worse, frustrate and lose) the struggling readers, but I respect leaving things intact, too. Thanks for all the input! Valerie ________________________________ From: Gary Petraccaro <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tue, September 4, 2012 5:29:54 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on readability presentation Fairly strong disagreement, here. Styles are what make different periods what they are. I could change all of the punctuation in Melville's books to conform to current usage, but it wouldn't be him to some extent and the book would lose its flavor. I'm currently doing some 80-year-old science fiction and it could be changed but you wouldn't be reading that story once I had finished. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Valerie Maples >To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Alisa Moore ; Carrie Karnos ; Madeleine >Linares > >Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 4:55 AM >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Question on readability presentation > > >I know occasionally allowances are made for slight changes to the print to >allow for better readability. I am doing a very old book where instead of >bolding words to be important/emphasized they are instead separating each >letter with a hyphen to make it more dramatic. An example in this book was >the word wonderful, which was instead represented as: "w-o-n-d-e-r-f-u-1". > > It would be wonderful (no pun intended) if we had permission to remove the >hyphens and unify the word and instead place it in bold print. Would this >be >an allowable exception to improve readability/listening? > > >Thanks! > Valerie