[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question about Tables
- From: Mike <mlsestak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:12:09 -0800
If you can contact the person who did the scanning, I tend to think that
having the book as complete as possible is best. While the table
contents summarized in the text may be fine for most readers, for
someone really studying the subject, having the full information could
be useful.
If you give the book title and page (and ISBN if possible) maybe one of
us sighted volunteers can get you the tables.
However, if none of this works, I don't think this is enough of a flaw
to keep the book out of the system. Just put in your comment and forge on.
Misha
On 11/14/2010 6:55 AM, Lori Castner wrote:
Hi, Folks,
I did check the manual for an answer to this question, but could not
find what I need.
I am proofreading a book which contains two tables. I am using Word
2003 to proofread. Normally, a table will be identified as such when
reading in Word. These tables are not identified that way so I am
sure they were not created using the table feature in Word.
Also, the material in the tables did not scan well; however, from what
I can tell, the tables summarize material presented verbally in the text.
So, is it necessary for me to contact the submitter to ask that she
e-mail appropriately formatted tables, or may I delete the material
from the text and add a reader note stating that the material appears
in the text? Or are there other steps I should follow?
Thanks.
Lori C.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
