[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

  • From: "Marissa Mika" <Marissa.M@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:12:03 -0800

I don't claim to know the answer nor the innerworkings of the approval
master's mind (which is why I'm CCing him on this). 

Occasionally, I'll kick a book back to a validator who has rejected the
book but has then requested that it be kicked back to the validator has
specifically requested it (maybe due to the fact that they've gotten
missing pages and can complete the book, etc). 

On the few approvals that I have done, I haven't kicked any rejected
books back to the download cue.


-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Otten
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:23 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

Well, that, in my view, is absurd. marissa, can we get a reading on
this? If a validator says text quality is poor and needs a rescan and
rejects the book, why would the admin kick that back? What is the point
rejecting if validators will be second guessed by the admin?

Other related posts: