[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

  • From: "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:23:16 -0600

Well, that, in my view, is absurd. marissa, can we get a reading on this? If a 
validator says text quality is poor and needs a rescan and rejects the book, 
why would the admin kick that back? What is the point of 
rejecting if validators will be second guessed by the admin?
Mary



Other related posts: