[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question

  • From: "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:23:16 -0600

Well, that, in my view, is absurd. marissa, can we get a reading on this? If a 
validator says text quality is poor and needs a rescan and rejects the book, 
why would the admin kick that back? What is the point of 
rejecting if validators will be second guessed by the admin?

Other related posts: