[bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:05:15 -0700
I personally try to strive for an accuracy rating of 99 point something
percent...preferably the upper range, like the last Janette Oke book I
submitted. If I remember correctly, its rating was 99.6 percent or something
like that, and that was with a lot of dialect in it. This one has quite a
bit, too...the one I'm working on now, so really, if it hadn't been for
that, it probably would have been pretty close to 100 percent accurate, and
that's what I strive for. A book has to have an accuracy rating of at least
99 percent for me to submit it, or awfully close, but that's a personal
standard of mine, not anything Bookshare dictates. Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kaitlyn Hill" <Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:22 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Quality and validation credits
Hello All:)
It's a cloudy Sunday morning here in Portland and I'm off to the races:)
Dragon boat races that is.
Two questions.
First for the K1000 users what is the general standard for spelling ranging.
How low do people try to get that number. I know, 0 is ideal?
Second, I have been a little unclear on the credit for scanning and
validating. What does one get for each? It seems I have heard some different
numbers.
Kaitlyn
Level III Practitioner
Reconnective healing and the Reconnection
Level 1 Reiki healing
Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take but by the number of
moments that take your breath away:)
Other related posts:
