[bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem

  • From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:47:42 -0700

It is possible I am missing them but I do look with a CCTV as I know that 
Kurzweil often misses numbers. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mayrie ReNae 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:20 AM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem


  Hi Jill,

      Can we be certain that the roman numerals aren't printed in the books?  I 
know, for instance, that without exception, I never get page numbers containing 
single digits to scan and have to insert them.  I have checked, and again, 
without exception, they are in the books that I have scanned.  Do you think 
it's possible that said Roman Numerals are in the books and are not scanning or 
are scanning as unrecognizable junk?  

      Mayrie





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jill O'Connell
  Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:55 AM
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem


  Since Bookshare has made such a point about not making any changes in the 
books we scan including obvious printing errors, I consider adding numbers that 
aren't printed in the book making changes. 
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bob 
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:38 AM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem


    Sure there's lower-case roman numerals. They are the ones not in caps.

    I think many books begin their books with lower-case roman numerals. But, 
don't know for sure.

    Besides, it's just a suggestion, do it, don't do it, do some of it. It's 
your call.

    Bob

    "We know the future will outlast all of us, but I believe that all of us 
will live on in the future we make,"
    Senator Edward M. Kennedy 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Jill O'Connell 
      To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:46 AM
      Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem


      Mayrie, I'm curious to know what census came up with the idea of lower 
case Roman numerals; is there even such a thing? 
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Mayrie ReNae 
        To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 5:05 AM
        Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Puzzling Problem


        Hi Lori,

            It isn't exact, but I have experienced what you are talking about.  
I just number backward from roman numeral ix and if there are pages before 
roman numeral i, well, then, I just leave them unnumbered.

            Often there are pages before what the publisher seemed to consider 
the first page of the book containing raves and things like that that they seem 
not to consider pages.

            Why do we number the preliminary pages?  Because it makes sense, I 
guess.  And I assume that if the publisher actually numbered a page ix, then it 
seems sensible that said publisher considered, or even did (but they didn't 
scan) number the pages before that page with the preceding roman numerals.

            This is not a step required by bookshare.  Remember that bookshare 
only requires that a book have all of its pages, an accurate copyright page and 
title page, and 90% of page breaks, with the 90% of page numbers being in the 
works to be required.  The rest of what we have written about in our 
documentation for proofreading and scanning are the things that a concensus of 
quite a few people consider the best way to create the most readable books 
possible.  Since bookshare only requires the things I've mentioned above, as 
Bob says, I guess the rest are just suggestions.  

            I do want to say that a lot of experience and conversation did go 
into creating the suggestions that we created. And we didn't decide anything 
just because we felt like making more work for ourselves or for other people.

            I'm sorry everything isn't exact and set in stone. Or anywhere near 
perfect in every single situation.  

        Mayrie





------------------------------------------------------------------------
        From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lori Castner
        Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 4:11 AM
        To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Puzzling Problem


        Hi, Everyone,

        I have a very minor puzzling situation in a book I'm proofreading.

        In one of the newer documents on what to do as a proofreader, it states 
that we are to number preliminary pages with lower case Roman numerals 
beginning with i.

        However, in this book I am proofing, the acknowledgments begin on IX 
(Roman numeral nine), but there are ten actual pages before the acknowledgments 
begin.  One is a blank page which I can remove, but even so there will still be 
nine preliminary pages before the first page with a page number, Roman numeral 
nine.  Do I begin my lower case numerals with zero--is there a Roman numeral 
for zero?

        And why are we numbering these unnumbered preliminary pages anyway?

        Bob, I'm waiting for a humorous answer from you, but also seriously 
what do I do when the number of unnumbered pages is greater than the lower case 
numerals?

        Lori C.



------------------------------------------------------------------------



        No virus found in this incoming message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
        Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2333 - Release Date: 
08/28/09 06:26:00



----------------------------------------------------------------------------



    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
    Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2333 - Release Date: 08/29/09 
06:39:00



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2333 - Release Date: 08/29/09 
06:39:00

Other related posts: