If you are set to plain text (like my replies are); then it would have been stripped of formatting like color. I have rich text turned on to make it easier to receive imbedded images so pictures are not attachments. Valerie On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:52 AM, Emily Harrison wrote: > That's weird; I'm fully sighted, and I was able to read Robin's message just > fine. Maybe it has something to do with email providers? > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > He, Robin! > > Your messages are arriving as black (and thus unreadable unless we highlight > or reply in plain text) to sighted volunteers. Glad you got the right > advice, though about page numbers. > > Valerie > > > On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Van Lants wrote: > >> Ok. Considering the book is 91 scanned pages in Microsoft Word, I suppose >> I'll just add the page numbers than. >> >> Robin >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Jamie Yates, CPhT >> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:00 PM >> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing children's book from 1922 >> >> Carrie said if the children's books are under 50 pages or so and do not have >> numbers in the print book, then it is not necessary to add them. Over 50 >> then they should be added even if they aren't in the print book. >> >> >> -- >> Jamie in Michigan >> >> Currently Reading: The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction by Linda Gordon >> Earn cash for answering trivia questions every 3 >> hours:http://instantcashsweepstakes.com/invitations/ref_link/49497 >> >> See everything I've read this year at: www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature >> database 5002 (20100405) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com > > > > > -- > Emily Harrison > greeniebone@xxxxxxxxx