[bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing children's book from 1922
- From: Emily Harrison <greeniebone@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 03:52:51 -0500
That's weird; I'm fully sighted, and I was able to read Robin's message just
fine. Maybe it has something to do with email providers?
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> He, Robin!
>
> Your messages are arriving as black (and thus unreadable unless we
> highlight or reply in plain text) to sighted volunteers. Glad you got the
> right advice, though about page numbers.
>
> Valerie
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Van Lants wrote:
>
> Ok. Considering the book is 91 scanned pages in Microsoft Word, I suppose
> I'll just add the page numbers than.
>
> Robin
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jamie Yates, CPhT <mirxtech@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:00 PM
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: Proofing children's book from 1922
>
> Carrie said if the children's books are under 50 pages or so and do not
> have numbers in the print book, then it is not necessary to add them. Over
> 50 then they should be added even if they aren't in the print book.
>
>
> --
> Jamie in Michigan
>
> Currently Reading: The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction by Linda Gordon
> Earn cash for answering trivia questions every 3 hours:
> http://instantcashsweepstakes.com/invitations/ref_link/49497
>
> See everything I've read this year at: www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5002 (20100405) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
--
Emily Harrison
greeniebone@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
