Elizabeth, I want to compliment you and others like you who take the nonfiction, some of the books very long, to validate. I admit that unless specifically asked, I avoid them--although having been asked I have become acquainted withe some books that I've kept from the library to read myself. But I think downloading for validation history and philosophy that you can't know in advance is interestingly written deserves more credit than you and others like you get. Cindy -- "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am validating The War on Choice. It was submitted > in kes format. I do > not know what version of k1000 the submitter has. > The book came in with a > 97% rating. It needs a lot of work. Much of that > work seems to be pattern > work and I think I can get it to decent quality > though I have just started > working on it. I have good tools in version 9. The > submitter needs to > optimize if she knows how to do that. Her letter u > is coming out as m for > instance. e is being scanned as c resulting in > things like > > comrt for court > comrse for course > bc for be. > > This is probably a brightness issue though other > things could be > involved. The optimizer knows more in this case > than I do. > > E. > > At 05:05 PM 9/1/2005, you wrote: > >I aam fine with volunteers taking huge breaks and > staying on the lists. I > >just mind it if folks are using the time to > download stuff off the step 2 > >page instead of paying up membership fee. Call me > paranoid but I have > >known some blind folks whose moto is "if it's free > it's for me" who might > >do such a thing. I understand all of us need > breaks. Sorry if I gave > >offense. > > > > > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs