[bksvol-discuss] Re: No OT? and quiet list

  • From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 23:35:32 -0700

I never asked for these but have always been wondering about them, so 
thanks! Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 9:00 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: No OT? and quiet list


Before you read, I will tell you it's definitely easier to use shortcut
commands in this window, because if you don't, after each step you will have
to tab or shift tab back to the list.  So anyways, here goes.
\1. open the view menu with alt V
2. arrow down and enter on column...
Now you'll be in a list of all the message fields, attachments, from,
subject, sent and received, and more.
Arrowing down the list from top to bottom will show you the list in which
the fields now show from left to right in your mail folder index, so if
there was a field, like in this case you want to see the subject earlier,
you:
1. arrow down to subject
2. tab over and push space on  the move up button. The shortcut is alt U.
Rather than moving a few of fields up, sometimes it is just easier to move
one field down. In that case you:
1. arrow up to it
2. tab to and push space on the down button. The shortcut is alt D.
Another note, if there is a field in this list which you don't care about,
like in this case I do display the sent date, but I don't care about the
received date and size, you can have them not display. Not only does this
cut out a lot of extra verbiage, but it gives you more room to see the
fields you want, so things like subject lines, which are sometimes long,
don't get cut off.
If you don't want a particular field to show:
1. arrow down to the field
2. tab to and push space on the hide button . The shortcut is alt H.
If by accident you hid a field you do want to see:
1. arrow back to it
2. tab to and push space on the show button. The shortcut is alt S.
Once all the fields  you want are displaying in the correct order, don't
forget to tab to and push space on the ok button.
That should be it..

Tiff
----- Original Message -----
From: "robert tweedy" <rtweedy2@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: No OT? and quiet list


> Tiff just to learn something new, do you have the instructions for outlook
> express 6 I think that's in windows XP?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:20 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: No OT? and quiet list
>
>
> > On that line, depending on what email client you use, you may be able to
> > display message fields in non-standard order. For example, put the
subject
> > line to the left of the sender's name, so you don't have to listen
through
> > as many syllables before knowing you want to delete a message. I'm sure
> > this
> > is possible with outlook and outlook express, but I haven't used Eudora
in
> > many years so can't recall. If you want instructions let me know and
I'll
> > jot them down.
> > Tiff
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:02 AM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: No OT? and quiet list
> >
> >
> >> Chiming in on the topic of ... topics, I think that at very least we
> > should
> >> put OT in the subject if the content of the message isn't going to
relate
> > to
> >> the essential purpose of this list.  I'm not a fan of censorship, but
> >> this
> >> list does have a tendency to get *way* out of hand when it comes to
> > jumping
> >> all over the map.  Let's just be diligent to put OT in the subject, and
> > put
> >> it before anything else, so when people hear or see that, they can zap
> >> the
> >> message into the trash asap.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>






Other related posts: