[bksvol-discuss] Re: New 3 hold maximum in check out queue
- From: Regina Alvarado <reggie.alvarado@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:52:46 -0400
Valerie:
When she announces them in advance I imagine perhaps someone has already
jumped in and gotten it since I have never gotten a response from her, at
least not for a long time. She must be getting proofers that specifically
contact her. That is OK. I was just pointing out that putting titles here
would not necessarily solve the bolunteer book problem.
Reggie
_____
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Valerie Maples
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 4:35 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Shelley Rhodes
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New 3 hold maximum in check out queue
Reggie;
Shelley Rhodes does DOZENS of books on dogs, almost always announced in
advance and I am sure she would put one up for you or you can just grab it
when it goes on the list. Shelley works with many, many different
proofers...
Valerie
_____
From: Regina Alvarado <reggie.alvarado@xxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, July 26, 2012 7:11:35 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New 3 hold maximum in check out queue
Only problem with what you are telling Tracy is the same as for me. I had
to beg for a book on the list, and it was Mary that got it for me and one
other person. All the scanners are "attached" to their proofers. I have
often asked for a hold to be put on especially books on dogs, and I have
never received a reply nor a hold. Also, not every volunteer can wade
through the traffic on this list just to get to know the people. Not only
that, but I have often felt the clique feeling here, though not towards me
in particular. Lets not demand that all volunteers be on this list! Bad
idea just to find a scanner which they may not find. (smiles) My opinion,
of course.
Reggie
Other related posts:
