Hey guys, Recently (this past spring semester) I had to download The Norton Anthology of American Literature shorter 7th ed. by Nina Baym for my American Literature English class in which the book had tons of footnotes and I do mean tons. From a reader prospective, I found those square brackets necessary. Now keep in mind that I most often read the book straight from the computer opting not to use the stream or Packmate (which I don't use often anyway) simply because it made navigation much easier as well as I could "see" the form of the work...end of the line for poems and the like. With that being said, those square brackets made knowing where actual text ended and "the footnotes" begin. It is not that obvious when reading text. I often find it more annoying when JAWS says star, star,star,star. Rather than open brack text the close bracket. Yes, the square brackets are more often used when a author has altered the text during a direct quote, for example, "After the notes is generally the end of the page and it seems fairly obvious [not so obvious] where the end of the page is and a new one begins." --this may have not been an good example but hopefully you get my point. This is not always an obvious situation--where the page ends and another one begins as I have stated this in an earlier email (page numbers, I think). Like I said, using those brackets with the word-begin footnotes and end footnotes seems to be the better choice then again, what do I know. When changes like these are made it seems that the blind community is never asked or given the choice. Most changes that are made for the "benefit of the blind" are usually made by sighted people who know what's best for us. **venting** Netta "Just because you are blind does not mean you lack vision"-Stevie Wonder To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.