[bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again

  • From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:30:30 -0500

I am pretty sure that your surmise is correct.
Sometimes people do put in incorrect information on the submission form. For instance, I recently validated a book in which the author was Cathryn but the submission form said Cathy, and the book clearly stated that "Cathryn" was the author and copy right holder.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:13 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



I just checked, and it hasn't come back yet. But if it does, I will do as you advise. I did enter in the comments field when I uploaded the book this morning that the title and copyright information was correct, but I did not actually paste the information into the field. Maybe that will be good enough, but if not, I will do it when it comes back.

My problem is not that this information needs to be accurate, or that it may have been returned because of uncertainty about the accuracy of the information. My problem is really with the uninformative nature of the reason given for the return - especially the second time. The first time, I can understand that. But after someone else looked at it and sent it back up, it might have occurred to him that a little clearer communication might be a good idea since the book still had the same problem after two validations. That's my biggest problem. I'm still only guessing that it has something to do with the fact that the author's name and the copyright holder's name don't precisely match; but I can't know because I don't have the information to know that, and it would have been a quick and simple matter to provide it.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



Evan:

In Admin's defense, , they have no way of knowing that you did verify it with a print copy. In the future you can indicate this in the comments field. As a matter of fact, don't be surprised if the book comes back again since the question was not answered. If I were you I'd check the download page to see if the book was back again. ----- This is a legal issue and bookshare has to be sure this information is accurate.

I have validated a few hundred books and so have a good idea what is required. And still occasionally 1 of my books get kicked back. So don't be discouraged.

All you have to do is indicate in the comments field who is the copyright holder and tell them that you verified with a print copy. I would also paste the title, copyright date and holder in the comments field.

Grace
Original Message ----- From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:48 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



Yes, the title is complete. I bought a copy of the book online, and I know it is complete. The copyright information is in the book, which is identical to that on the form. Verifying the copyright information with that .gov site at least is impossible, as their records are incomplete, and several months behind besides as they say right there. But since I own a copy and can readily read the copyright information, I saw no need to verify it. If he had a problem with the author's name and the copyright holder's name not matching, then .... Well, I've already covered that.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:02 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



Was the title complete? There's been times that books get kicked back because the title is incomplete. I usually double check it with Bn.com or Amazon.com to be sure that the information is correct. And when I do this I let the admin know in the comments field that I
verified it with these sources.
In your case I would have double checked online, explained my findings on the comments field and pasted the copyright info on the comments field.


There's a tip on Jake's site on verifying copyright information.

http://www.jbrownell.com/bks/tip.asp?id=22

Hope this helps.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:39 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



As far as the copyright information and the author information not jibing goes, the author is Kate Elliott, and the copyright holder is Katrina Elliott. Maybe that's what set him off, but it is correct on the form and in the book. This is book six in the series, and all five previous books are by Kate Elliott, copyright Katrina Elliott.

But if the book was kicked back once, and Ginny validated it and sent it back up, why was it kicked back a second time. This is the most irritating part of this thing. If Gustavo had just taken one minute to write a simple sentence - at least the second time - giving just a tiny bit more information, a lot of time and bandwidth could have been put to better use. If the fact that the author's name and the copyright holder's name didn't exactly match is what bothered him, then why didn't he just say so. If it's another issue, then why didn't he say what it was, especially after kicking it back for a second time? I'm going to keep on asking this question until I get an answer. It really bugs me.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I just uploaded The Book Again



When it gets kicked back with a comment about
something needs to be checked, it's administrative
staff, even though Gustavo's name isn't on it. Ginny
probably was a volunteer to worked on it at one time
and released it.

What happens is this, although maybe you've already
figured it out from all the responses:

After you validate a book and upload it, it gets
checked by a bookshare employee, usually Gustavo at
this time. He doesn't look at the book itself--just at
the form, so if, originally, the copyright holder's
name was not in the space in the submission form, or
if, perhaps, it didn't jibe with the author's name
(since in this case the translator holds the
copyright)and so looked suspicious to Gustavo or
someone, it would be kicked back with a note to have
it checked. Unfortunately, so far bookshare hasn't
replaced any former employees who helped in the
checking and so books get backlogged in the
admdinistrator queue.

Also unfortunately, the copyright law and liability
problems prevent any of us volunteers being able to
help with the checking, which would be really easy and
would unblock the clogged queue.

It's a good thing you happened to notice that your
book was back on the download list. Many of us haven't
been, assuming all is well, and while we wait for our
book to be approved, and we don't know it's back on
the list for some minor problem to be solved, someone
else takes it and validates it anew and uploads it
correctly.

The glitch, as I think Jake pointed out, is that the
original is the book that is returned, not the
validated copy, so instead of someone other than the
validator, who notices the book and sees what's
required, being able to download it and put in the
missing information and uploading it, that person has
to do a whole new validation. That's why, as Jake
said, I and others have started to keep out validated
copies so we can just upload them and correct the
form.

I hope I haven't further confused you and that my
explanation is clear and is not duplicative. I tend to
talk and write too much sometimes.

Cindy


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.



To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.



To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: