Hi Caitlyn, I actually don't mind any of what is being suggested. It all makes good sense in most cases. What I object to is a practice that I know goes on. There are some validators who download a book to validate it and upload it without doing any work. I have seen this happen with submissions of mine. I believe that in my case, some very lazy folks know that I prevalidate my books and assume that there is no need for them to do anything. Easy credit for them! I want to make work easy for folks who validate my books. But I am human and make mistakes. I want a validator to catch what I have missed. That is ideal. But if I can see that no work has been done on the book, I sure don't want to fix errors so that the person who did nothing can get credit for the validation. I'm not saying that anyone else should feel or act as I do. I know that the grand majority of validators, especially those who subscribe to this mailing list, do a stellar job! I personally, will refrain from fixing errors that a validator could and should fix. If the kinds of mistakes that you, and Sue, and E have mentioned are the issue, it makes absolutely perfect sense to follow protocol. I love the improved communication about books being worked on. I'm happy to fix errors in my books if they need my fixing. I'm just not happy to do work so that someone who has done absolutely nothing to validate a book gets credit for that work. Perhaps the kind of thing that I have experienced doesn't happen often and I just had the experience twice out of co-incidence. I don't know. It just got under my skin to know with a certainty that no work was done on my books, that errors were left in them (junk characters to remove in both cases) and the book was uploaded to the administration queue for addition to the bookshare collection, and then I got a note to fix the books (which I did) and then someone else who had changed ABSOLUTELY nothing from my submission would get credit for it. Sorry about the seriously run-on sentence. And sorry about the mini-rant. Have I clarified my position? I know that we do have a lot of very hard-working validators, and I appreciate every single one of you! Mayrie -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Caitlyn and Nicky Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 1:54 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: I am not happy. I can see your point in this, Mayrie. However, this recently happened to me with a book. In my case, I know the validater sepnt several weeks fixing things which I have no idea how they got messed up, corrected some measurements which escaped my notice, etc. The book was returned for further editing, there were only a few tiny little things, which I fixed and then uploaded. Honestly, I thought the changes could've been made by the validater, but it was no big deal for me to do it. I didn't think it was fair for me to get credit for both submitting and validating the book, as bookshare forbids us validating and submitting the same book. I wrote a note to Carrie, and she fixed things up so the validater could get the credit for all her work on the book, and I got credit for submitting it in the first place... What would you suggest should be done, seeing as we can't get credit for both validation and submission of the same book? Just let it go back to step one and hope another volunteer picks it up and fixes it?? Curiously, Caitlyn -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of mayrierenae@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:21 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] I am not happy. Hi Everyone, I'm going to paste here a section from the latest volunteer newsletter with wich I am not very happy. from now on books will be returned to the download list with a "Hold for Validator or Submitter". Depending on the nature of the correction, and/or who is best able to make the correction, either the submitter or the validator will re-upload the book. If re-edits are uploaded by the submitter, either the submitter or the validator should write to us requesting that validation credits be transferred from the submitter to the appropriate validator. We will make the transfer accordingly. Uh, if a validator hasn't done a job complete enough for a book to be included in the bookshare collection, and the submitter makes corrections that a validator should have made, that validator should not get credit. The validator should have contacted the submitter either directly or via bookshare staff before uploading to fix things that need fixing. What's the deal with giving people credit for work not done? These are just my opinions, but as a submitter, I don't have any intention of fixing errors in a book that I submit if the validator is going to get credit for not having done the work. Mayrie To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.