[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fw: scanning bibles?
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:20:06 -0500
Yes I see, in general footnotes are badnews!
G.
Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone: (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html
"Paula Muysenberg" <outofsightlife@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/14/2004 09:15 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fw: scanning bibles?
Hi E,
The other part of the story was on the K1000 list, where the
discussion
originally started. Someone needs to evaluate a particular Bible that has
devotional footnotes, and wondered how well it might scan. While there are
lots of Bible translations available online, publishers often come out
with
Bibles that have footnotes, specially written for various groups--e.g.,
teens, or people going through difficult times.
HTH,
Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:15 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fw: scanning bibles?
> What is going on with all this discussion about scanning bibles? I just
do
> not get it. There are many many versions available on cd, on line, and
in
> braille and large print. Surely I must be missing some part of this
> story. Can someone explain?
>
> E.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
