[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fw: Plants Prefer Synthetic Speech

  • From: "Paula and James Muysenberg" <outofsightlife@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:21:43 -0600


    I don't usually forward stuff, but given today's date, I thought you might 
enjoy this. A guy sent this to the Bookshare Volunteers' e-mail list.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Guido Corona 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:18 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Fw: Plants Prefer Synthetic Speech

  Dr. Jay Leventhal of the American Foundation For The Blind ust signalled me 
the following article on application of TTS to Horticulture by the sage of 
Appenzell.  Please read on for details.  And remember:  all techniques 
discussed should be applied externally only.  Do not ingest and do not inject. 



  Guido Dante Corona
  IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
  Research Division,
  Phone:  512. 838. 9735.
  Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Web:  http://www.ibm.com/able

  ----- Forwarded by Guido Corona/Austin/IBM on 04/01/2005 02:14 PM ----- 
        "Jay Leventhal" <jaylev@xxxxxxx> 
        04/01/2005 01:56 PM 
       To Guido Corona/Austin/IBM@IBMUS  
              Subject Plants Prefer Synthetic Speech 




  From: Jay Leventhal 
  Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:58 PM
  To: techteam
  Subject: Plants Prefer Synthetic Speech

  A study conducted by professor Aloysius Q. Schmaltzenstein's research team in 
Flumserberg, Switzerland, has shown that plants prefer synthetic speech over 
human speech. A variety of plant species were tested. While some plants were 
regularly read to by graduate students, others were placed near computers which 
read to them using a variety of speech synthesizers.  The same texts were read 
in each case, from classic literature to current magazines. Measurements were 
taken weekly.  Changes in the plants were noted throughout a six-month period. 
  The surprising results of the research showed that the plants exposed to 
synthetic speech thrived--they grew faster and produced more flowers than the 
plants exposed to human speech. Professor Schmaltzenstein believes that 
synthetic speech provided consistent companionship for "our green friends." He 
said that plants being read to by humans may have been disturbed by a variety 
of factors, including long silences and bad breath.  

Other related posts: