[bksvol-discuss] Re: Epson Scanners

  • From: "J.M." <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 18:38:14 -0700

I'm just curious, but why is the 1650 better than the 1670? I happen to have 
the 1650, and you'd think newer models would be better, but I know that's 
not always true. Just curious. Take care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in 
your heart.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Susan Lumpkin" <slumpkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 5:50 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Epson Scanners


Both those scanners are okay but between the two of them, you should choose 
the 1650 if you can not find the 1660. Did you try the Epson site itself? 
For a while, a short time ago,  they had the Epson Perfection 1660 scanners 
for $65 again but don't know whether or not they still do. Good luck.


-----Original Message-----
.From: "Jackie M."<xercon@xxxxxxx>
.Sent: 8/28/04 7:29:43 AM
.To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Epson Scanners
.I was looking for the Epson 1660 scanner discussed in July on this list.  I 
found Epson perfection 1650 and Epson Perfection 1670. Each is $69, 
refurbished.  Are those okay substitutes for the Epson 1660?  Nobody 
mentioned the work Perfection, and these are photo scanners, so I wasn't 
sure.  Please help.
.- Jackie McCraw

Other related posts: