[bksvol-discuss] Re: Adult Content
- From: "John Simpson" <John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:22:49 -0800
If I may be permitted a bit of humor, there is no gray area in 50 Shades of
Grey.
_____
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Madeleine Linares
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 2:54 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Adult Content
Hi everyone,
I thought it was about time for a refresher course in what we mean by Adult
Content (also known as "AC"). There has been some confusion (off-list) and
I've noticed it incorrectly marked in the Approval Queue.
Here is a note from our Collection Development Manager on our definition:
"Our policy, developed in conjunction with our OSEP funders, is that there
are certain kinds of content -- explicit depictions of sexual acts with no
redeeming social value, as well as extreme and gratuitous violence -- will
require a minor to get an adult guardian's permission to access. As a
"content-neutral" collection, we will never exclude a title for any
potentially controversial or distasteful content, but we will tag some
content for adult (or minors with a guardian's permission) use only. The
idea is that parents can control the access their kids have to content
deemed potentially inappropriate -- but they don't have the right to control
or limit access to anybody else's kids.
The "walking into a bookstore or library" test continues to be a good one.
Could a non-print-disabled kid walk into a good bookstore or public library
and get a copy of this book without an adult being involved? If the answer
is yes, a print-disabled kid should be able to do the same on Bookshare. We
are not interested in placing additional barriers to access for our members
that their peers do not experience. This means we do have stuff available
to members under 18 that has sex, and swearing, and violence, and substance
abuse in it, and that is okay and in keeping with the generally recognized
standards of "freedom to read" policy in this country.
We don't have a perfect implementation of this policy yet -- I see evidence
that we were a little more strait-laced in the early days (and fix it when I
come across it), and our automated filtering from publisher feeds still
needs some fine-tuning. When I'm trying to navigate something particular
"gray area-y" like the steamier of the romances coming in, I ask myself
about the intent -- is the action (even if hot and heavy) designed to move
the characters towards relationship, or is the plot driven only by the need
to get body parts intermingling again? It's the latter that's clearly AC,
while the former continues to be ambiguous. Author intent is, alas, pretty
gray-area-y and subjective itself, but I think it can help separate the
sheep from the goats."
Adult content is confusing and clearly not black and white. Many romances
(such as a lot of the Harlequin ones), though certainly racy, should not be
labeled as AC. A 16-year-old could walk into a book store and buy ones of
those books just as easily as a 38-year old, although his or her parents
might not approve and might consider the content inappropriate. Anyway, just
thought it couldn't hurt to remind everyone!
Feel free to contact me with questions, as always.
Best,
Madeleine Linares
Volunteer Coordinator
Bookshare, a Benetech Initiative
650-644-3459
madeleinel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Join
<http://blog.bookshare.org/2012/03/11/join-bookshares-worldwide-10th-anniver
sary-celebration/> us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
Title: Bookshare logo: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
Other related posts:
