[bitlug] Re: talk

  • From: Deepak Srinivasa <Deepak.Srinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bitlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:52:21 +0530

Hey People!!!!
We would like to know in detail abt each topic and the purpose.... Atleast 
iam not very clear of the purpose.
As far as advertising is concerned i think someone from the college should 
volunteer first..........


Peeyush Prasad <peeyush@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: bitlug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
02/24/2004 11:44 AM
Please respond to


[bitlug] Re: talk

ok, in the absence of others collaborating:
 TC: 2,4::C api
 me: 3,4::lin api
I guess we can collaborate on item 5, although it might not be necessary
to do that at all...
 what I was saying is that we give a taste of all topics in session one,
and address them induvidually in the coming sessions...
 So, spend (most) 15 mins on the philosophy of each subtopic in the first
talk. This, coupled with the lug intro and the 2hr booze party at the end
ought to take care of the 1.5 hrs :^)
 anybody, I have lost aswath's mailid and tel num, will appreciate if
someone ties up that end with a confirm from him... also the advrrt dept
needs to swing into action...
-- P

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, TC, PAVAN wrote:

> > 2. Getting raw data to PC
> >     Harddisk basics
> >     hdd-os interaction
> > 3. Managing data
> >     on Hdd (filesystems)
> >     on OS  (VFS)
> > 4. User interface
> >     C api
> >     Linux syscalls
> > 5. Efficiency considerations(Advanced)
> >     What filesystem, what layout etc.
> >     FS buffering issues
> The split up seems Ok, but not 2,3 and 4 together.
> Since we can also club the app with 4, we can make this an exclusive
> session. 2 & 3 in one, 4 in one, and if time permits, we can
> squeeze 5 in the same session.
> Now, who does what? me fine with any topic. pep, pick n' choose.
> TC

Other related posts: