[battlefield] Re: Super sexy Monitor
- From: Martin Brownell <marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: battlefield@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:42:14 -0600
Mine is a 144MHz and I can say I notice a difference but that is also
because my cards can push it to that high a refresh rate. I haven't had my
cards plugged into anything else. I do have an older monitor hanging
around, I should plug the two in and see what the difference looks like.
On Apr 24, 2014 11:37 AM, "chris brooks" <cebweb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> yeah. my reaction time is so quick i am looking into getting a -5 ms
> panel.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Martin Brownell <
> marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I think response time is only part of the equation though, monitor lag is
>> the other, and depending on the refresh rate the difference becomes greater
>> as the MHz goes up.
>>
>> From everything I have read, if you put a 1ms monitor next to a 5ms
>> monitor some people can notice a difference. But that's the crux of it...
>> SOME people notice a difference.
>>
>> I think it would be interesting to put our various monitors together
>> maybe even running off the same machine (I will offer mine up since I have
>> dual cards) and compare what different monitors look like running the same
>> game. It might be interesting to see if we notice a difference at all.
>>
>> My monitor runs at 1ms. But I can tell you that even though it's rated at
>> 1ms I would love something with better screen colors and resolution. The
>> trade off between speed and color rendering is pretty big. What does it
>> matter how fast your monitor refreshes if you can't SEE your opponent? Does
>> anyone in the group have an IPS display?
>> On Apr 24, 2014 10:57 AM, "James Theunplesant" <neonghost@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd live with 5ms for that Monitor.
>>>
>>>
>>> James C Snyder
>>>
>>> I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good
>>> intentions.
>>> Augusten Burroughs
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Martin Brownell <
>>> marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But it only has a 5 ms response... meh, barely adequate. I wouldn't
>>>> want to degrade your gaming experience that much. Such a shame too. It
>>>> looked promising.
>>>> On Apr 24, 2014 9:31 AM, "Ryan Hawley" <ryan.hawley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where is this "friend" application? I'd like to apply. I have good
>>>>> qualifications and live in fairly close proximity to you (just over the
>>>>> hill). I like long walks on the beach and will do my best to not shoot you
>>>>> in the back and use your corpse as a bullet shield.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Martin Brownell <
>>>>> marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea Wooties, buy two for me and one for a friend!!!
>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2014 8:52 AM, "Ryan Hawley" <ryan.hawley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pick it up from B&H.. It's only $1k. That way you can get 3 with the
>>>>>>> savings. heh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1040788&gclid=CPfbn7Ov-b0CFY17fgodTh0A4Q&Q=&is=REG&A=details
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Martin Brownell <
>>>>>>> marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ohhh well in that case put me down for 2.
>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2014 8:47 AM, "Jeremy Putnam" <lord.don@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Only $1,500 at Amazon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Martin Brownell <
>>>>>>>>> marty.brownell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I haven't been able to watch the whole review yet. How much is it?
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2014 8:13 AM, "James Theunplesant" <
>>>>>>>>>> neonghost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnrxNfxRK_4
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> James C Snyder
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good
>>>>>>>>>>> intentions.
>>>>>>>>>>> Augusten Burroughs
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
Other related posts:
