I thought it looks pretty cool, but I would hate waiting for the next game.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Tim Daley <tim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Its the team aspect in this game that makes me interested. Good to know
that I am alone though. I shall silence myself.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Travis Nutley <travisnutley@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
King of the Kill is the same type of game. I have it but haven't played
it yet. You don't have to spectate luckily, but there is a lot of running
around looting and dying quickly. It's fun to watch the top players play on
Twitch, though.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Ryan Hawley <ryan.hawley@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Siege is the only wait-a-round game I'm down to play.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Kulbacki <
danbackattack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It looks a lot like DayZ where you drop in scavenge your supplies for
10 min then die 1 min later and have to spectate then start all over
again. No thanks I dont want to wait around for the next round to start.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:31 PM, chris brooks <cebweb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes. Player unknown Battlegrounds has great potential but would be
infuriating to play. If you don't know what the game is about, It is a
battle royale, last man standing type game. you get dropped into a huge
open map like in Dayz but every X minutes a barrier shrinks the zone,
causing more player interaction/deaths. From what I am seeing games last
about 15 -20 minutes and you can die anytime.
Personally I do not like that it encourages playing on low settings so
you can see other players, and the long time between re-spawns. I think it
might be fun by yourself but definitely not as a game night game.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Travis Nutley <travisnutley@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:
I've watched quite a bit of it on Twitch. It looks fun but would
drive me crazy to actually play
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Tim Daley <tim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://youtu.be/-K_NyvcWDPY?t=1005
