From : E-Group, STC, Salt Lake, Kolkata Dear Member, Kindly double click on the enclosed attachment to read it. With regards, Anup Sen, Moderator E-Group, STC, Salt Lake, Kolkata email : stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx Using Internet Explorer in ATM PC of your branch, please browse http://10.128.74.200 (our Intranet Web-Site). We have provided lots of Reading Materials for you at the site. Happy browsing! We shall be glad to receive your feedbacks through emails regarding the mails being sent to you through this e-group. This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and kindly arrange to notify stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx immediately.Title: State Bank of India, Staff Training Centre, Salt Lake, Kolkata. : : stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx : :
Since the publication of first draft of
the Basel II Accord over two years ago, we have seen significant developments
in the way banks are approaching their Basel II programs. While the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) has provided its opinion that banks with business mix
greater than 20 per cent from abroad should adopt the framework, a few banks
regardless of the business mix have started working towards adopting this
framework. The appeal of the Accord is multifold as
it incorporates sensitivity to banks' internal methodologies and provides
incentives for better risk management, versus a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.
The banking industry has started recognising that the Basel II Accord evolves
from being a single step to a comprehensive and consistent program of risk
improvement. It will help if the dynamic requirements of regulators, business
managers, risk managers and finance professionals are examined, validated and
incorporated. It is also vital to maintain
coordination between business and IT, the two mainstays of the implementation
as without this, Basel II implementation will surely fail. Most banks in
developed countries have completed the program analysis phase, and the data
analysis phase is well under way. The emphasis now is moving to the
implementation of a tactical solution and identifying the target-operating
model for achieving compliance. In India, private sector banks that are
already investing in technology face teething problems that include appointing
a final internal authority, who will be building and maintaining this solution.
Surprising, as it may seem, we witness a significant disconnect between
business/risk managers and IT across the majority of Basel II programs. To
enable IT to deliver this policy-driven technical solution, clear requirements
are a must-have, as are robust communication and coordination plans. The majority of the public sector banks
lack data due to late computerisation. At the outset then, this means huge scale
IT investments to have the one critical element to implement Basel II
successfully. Data availability is important, but what is almost never
discussed is the framework to capture such data. Take the case of operations
risk: There are a set of mature approximation
techniques to migrate international operational risk loss data in the Indian
context. While they allow for scaling based on size indicators and time
adjustments they also provide the necessary richness about loss events.
Remember, because these operational risk events are rare in nature and a bank
in India may never have experienced that event but it is still exposed to it! The big flavour of Basel II - credit
risk - according to the New Basel Capital Accord, internal ratings must be
grounded in banks' historical experience and empirical evidence. This follows
from the fact that data analysis and statistical modelling are the fundamental
basis of any internal rating system. What this essentially translates into is
the right data model to collect and store a minimum of 3-5 years worth of
historical data. In addition to this, they need to ensure data integrity and
timeliness of figures, be able to assess not only the rating grades but combine
them with models for assessing 'Exposure at Default', the 'Loss Given Default'
for various maturity spectrums. This is when Risk Intelligence, a key
component of the Business Intelligence suite, is the default requirement. Risk
Intelligence empowers banks by providing them control to access, integrate and
analyse data to provide timely risk intelligence across credit, market and
operations risk. Undoubtedly, Risk Intelligence is the
vanguard for banks to effectively meet the deadline of 2006, demanding that its
presence among banks become the norm rather than exception to the rule.
However, before selecting the symbiotic business-IT approach, there are three
main strategic considerations that need to be borne in mind by all banks: v The Accord will continue to evolve, most
likely as smaller, iterative modifications rather than the wholesale accord
changes witnessed so far. v Banks will need to build enough
flexibility into their technical architecture - enough to incorporate these
changes as well as Risk Managers' recommendations. v Banks will also need to consider the
integration of their Basel II solution with the existing technical
infrastructure and any other major systems implementations that are already
planned. v Finally, as the Basel II program matures
into the strategic implementation phase, banks need to ensure that the solution
chosen is able to deliver the enhanced benefits that should be derived from
Basel II. Thus, questions that need to be
comprehensively answered by banks today are the following: v Has our logical data model been
validated by and mapped back to the Basel II Accord? v Do our reporting tools give us insight
into the capital calculation as well as performing the required regulatory
reports? v Do we have robust data capture,
cleansing and management practices in place? Banks need to realise that the Basel II
Accord is not a once-only requirement but an evolutionary program of risk
improvement. The relevance of the technical solution adopted will be gauged
against its ability to keep pace with these changes. Requirements of the regulators, business
managers, risk managers and finance professionals will evolve. To meet this
challenge, it is vital to maintain coordination between business and IT. The
course you set today will determine your ability to meet the challenges of
tomorrow. |