From : E-Group, STC, Salt Lake, Kolkata Dear Member, Kindly double click on the enclosed attachment to read it. With regards, Anup Sen, Moderator E-Group, STC, Salt Lake, Kolkata email : stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx Using Internet Explorer in ATM PC of your branch, please browse http://10.128.74.200 (our Intranet Web-Site). We have provided lots of Reading Materials for you at the site. Happy browsing! We shall be glad to receive your feedbacks through emails regarding the mails being sent to you through this e-group. This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and kindly arrange to notify stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx immediately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify to admin@xxxxxxxxx immediately. ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Email From ""Anup Sen, STC, Salt Lake City, Kolkata" <anup.sen@xxxxxxxxx>" was security checked by 3.90 version of CxProtect(tm) On: mail_store at: 21:10:08, 20-May-2004 Thursday Engine: 4.110.21, sign.def:20-May-2004, sign2.def:20-May-2004, macro.def:17-May-2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Detailed Virus Scanning Report is attached as "CxPReport on 20May04 at 21-10-08.txt" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message was scanned and no virus found ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Email From ""Anup Sen, STC, Salt Lake City, Kolkata" <anup.sen@xxxxxxxxx>" was security checked by 3.93 version of CxProtect(tm) On: sify_mta at: 21:11:18, 20-May-2004 Thursday Engine: 4.110.21, sign.def:20-May-2004, sign2.def:20-May-2004, macro.def:17-May-2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Detailed Virus Scanning Report is attached as "CxPReport on 20May04 at 21-11-18.txt" ----------------------------------------------------------------------Title: State Bank of India, Staff Training Centre, Salt Lake, Kolkata. : : stcsaltlake@xxxxxxxx : :
What is meant by an electronic cheque? An electronic cheque is a cheque in
electronic form (as against the usual paper instrument in writing). A cheque in
electronic form is defined in Explanation 1 to Section 6 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act as a cheque which contains the exact mirror image of a paper
cheque and is generated, written and signed in a secured system ensuring the
minimum safety standards with the use of digital signature (with or without biometric
signature and asymmetric crypto system). Are electronic cheques valid and
binding in law like paper instruments? The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has
been amended by the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act, 2002 to include a cheque in electronic form within the
definition of cheque in Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Hence, cheques in electronic form are valid
and binding in law like the paper instruments (cheques in writing on paper). Does the Information Technology Act
apply to cheques? What about other negotiable instruments? The Information Technology Act was not
originally applicable to Negotiable Instruments in terms of Section 1(4) of
that Act. The Information Technology Act was amended by the Negotiable
Instruments (Amendments and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 modifying
Section 1(4) and inserting Section 81A making the Act applicable to electronic
cheques. This is, however, subject to such modifications and amendments as may
be necessary for carrying out the purposes of Negotiable Instruments Act by the
Central Government, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India by
notification in the Official Gazette. The Act, however, does not apply to other
negotiable instruments, namely promissory notes and bills of exchange. What is meant by truncation of cheques? In truncation of cheques, cheques will
be scanned and the electronic image, instead of the physical cheque, will be
transmitted in the clearing cycle. A truncated cheque is defined in Section 6
(Explanation 1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act as a cheque which is truncated
during the course of a clearing cycle either by the clearing house or by the
bank whether paying or receiving payment, immediately on generation of an electronic
image for transmission, substituting the further physical movement of the
cheque in writing. Can the presentment of an electronic
image of a truncated cheque to the paying bank be treated as a valid
'presentment' within the meaning of section 64 of the NI Act? Under Section 64 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, a cheque must be presented for payment on behalf of the holder.
The definition of 'cheque' under section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as
amended by the Negotiable Instruments (Amendments and Miscellaneous Provisions)
Act, 2002 includes an electronic image of a truncated cheque. Hence, the
presentment of an electronic image of a truncated cheque would amount to presentment
of cheque for the purpose of section 64. What is the advantage of truncation of
cheques? Cheques are truncated for the purpose of
avoiding the physical movement of the paper instruments and instead transmitting
the electronic image of the truncated instruments thereby ensuring faster
clearing of the instruments and reduction in the cost of processing. It is, however, open to the drawee bank to
demand further information regarding a truncated cheque from the bank holding
the truncated cheque in case of any reasonable suspicion about the genuineness
of the apparent tenor of the instrument. Only in the case of suspicion of any
fraud, forgery, tampering or destruction of the instrument, the drawee/paying
bank is entitled to demand the presentment of the truncated cheque itself for
verification. Who will have the custody of the
truncated cheques? The collecting bank who receives the
payment shall be entitled to retain the truncated cheque. However, on suspicion
of any fraud, forgery, tampering or destruction of the instrument , the drawee
bank demands the presentment of the truncated cheque itself for verification
and after verification makes payment, the truncated cheque so demanded and paid
shall be retained by the drawee/paying bank. In the case of a truncated cheque, will
any difference in apparent tenor of the electronic image with the truncated
cheque be a material alteration under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act? Who is responsible to verify any difference in apparent tenor of the
electronic image with the truncated cheque? In the case of an electronic image of a
truncated cheque, any difference in apparent tenor of such electronic image
with the truncated cheque shall be a material alteration. It shall be the duty
of the bank or the clearing house, as the case may be, to ensure the exactness
of the apparent tenor of the electronic image of the truncated cheque while
truncating and transmitting the image. Any bank or the clearing house which
receives a transmitted electronic image of truncated cheque has a duty to
verify from the party who transmitted the image to it that the image so transmitted
to it and received by it is exactly the same. Who will verify the prima facie
genuineness of the cheque to be truncated? The banker who wants to receive payment
based on an electronic image of a truncated cheque held with him (collecting
bank) has the duty to verify the prima facie genuineness of the cheque to be
truncated. Any fraud, forgery or tampering apparent on the face of the
instrument which can be verified with due diligence and ordinary care has to be
so verified. |