Here's a hit of all the responses I received. Please forgive the cross-posting. There weren't too many, but they were helpful. I'd still be interested in hearing your thoughts if you didn't see this message the first time around. Thanks! ----- These two databases were on the table in Texas to be adopted state-wide and provided free to all schools. Librarians were asked which one they liked better based on different criteria such as grade levels, interface, added features, customer service, and types of databases available. School librarians consistently chose Gale. Interestingly, public libraries like Ebsco. Reasons why I like Gale: Blog-type interface with keyword links Amount of reference used to create the databases Icons indicating reading levels MLA/APA; incorporates Easybib Translates into 23 different languages Download to E-reader, share it via social media, email it Converts to mp3 ---- If you need literary criticism,---better go with Gale. --- I switched to Ebsco several years ago because I was so unhappy with changes Gale was making and with the overlap between the databases in their [consortium] package. I guess the grass is always greener elsewhere! I've been very happy with Ebsco, though I did keep Gale Global Issues in Conflict and GVRL. --- I use Ebsco databases at [name redacted] College where I fill in and I dislike them intensely, as do the other librarians there. Ebsco did a deal with the Calif. Community Colleges so they had to go with Ebsco, but they kept Lit. Research Ctr. from Gale as it's so much better. They also kept Opposing Viewpoints as it is better than what Ebsco has. I find the indexing poor - it seems to bring up too much or not enough. The literature searching is definitely worse. Of course, I am using the databases designed for high schools/ community colleges, so I cannot speak to any designed for lower level students. *Lisa Newton* Librarian York School 9501 York Road Monterey, CA 93940 lnewton@xxxxxxxx www.york.org/library