Heaven forbid these guys be allowed to defend themselves and their coworkers. Unless there is more to the story, I can't see how Wal- mart can justify terminating them. This is what happens when management enforces a zero tolerance policy and won't make exceptions. On May 9, 2011, at 8:21 PM, CarlGlas@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Four Wal-Mart employees have been fired after management said they > violated company policy by disarming an alleged shoplifter who had > pulled a gun inside the store. > > Lori Poulsen, Justin Richins, Shawn Ray and Gabriel Stewart were all > longtime workers at Wal-Mart's Layton, Utah, store. Poulsen was an > asset protection coordinator, Richins and Ray were asset protection > associates, and Stewart was an assistant manager. > > On Jan. 13, employees allegedly witnessed a man identified as Trent > Allen Longton take a netbook computer out of the package and stuff it > under his shirt. When Longton attempted to leave the store, he was > confronted by Poulsen, who escorted him to a nearby office. The two > were joined there by Ray, Richins and Stewart, Salt Lake City's > Deseret News reported. > > Inside the office, Longton allegedly pulled out a loaded handgun and > ran toward the office door, which was blocked by Ray, Richins and > Stewart. Longton then allegedly grabbed Stewart and shoved the gun > into his back. Concerned for their safety, the workers reacted > forcefully and disarmed Longton. > > In the police incident report, the investigating officer noted that > the Wal-Mart employees acted in the "best interest and safety" of > those around them. Longton, as it turned out, was a convicted felon > who was prohibited from possessing a firearm. > > Wal-Mart managers, however, disagreed. The following week, the four > workers were fired for violating the company's "Investigation and > Detention of Shoplifters Policy." The policy instructs employees to > retreat if an individual brandishes a weapon. > > "If during an approach or investigation, it becomes apparent that the > suspect has a weapon or brandishes or threatens use of a weapon; all > associates must disengage from the situation, withdraw to a safe > position, and contact law enforcement," reads a copy of the policy > available online. "If at any point the suspect or any other involved > person becomes violent, disengage from the confrontation, withdraw to > a safe position and contact law enforcement." > > The next paragraph instructs employees to "put people first," stating > that protecting the physical well-being of "suspects, customers and > Wal-Mart associates is your first priority." > > Speaking with the Deseret News last week, the dismissed employees > said they had nowhere to go and were forced to subdue the suspect > when he charged them. They also said they were not comfortable > allowing an armed man into the store area where shoppers could be at > risk. > > Sponsored Links > Wal-Mart did not immediately respond to a request for comment today > from AOL News. > > In a previously released statement obtained by The Deseret News, > managers defended their actions, saying the four put their safety > "and potentially the safety of our customers and other associates in > jeopardy." > > Stewart, who had been with Wal-Mart for 12 years, told the newspaper > he is still trying to understand the company's decision. > > "I honestly felt worse than when I had the gun to my back," he said. > "I honestly felt betrayed." > > http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/15/wal-mart-security-employees-fired-for-disarming-store-gunman/ > > > > > > The Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997 > The Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997