[aztec-devel] Re: Linux packaging (was Changing the way functions are handled)
- From: richard <rm.vaneijbergen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: aztec-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:47:05 +0200
On 2002.07.10 14:37 Vincent Caron wrote:
>
>
> This should be standard, meaning LSB compliant
> (http://www.linuxbase.org/). This is luckily autoconf defaults
> (/usr/local). The prefix choice is a matter of packaging, depending on
> the distro habits. For instance, most distros configure their packages
> with the '/usr' prefix.
>
>
mm'kay, my vote goes to LSB..
- Richard
Other related posts:
- » [aztec-devel] Re: Linux packaging (was Changing the way functions are handled)
