As Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Until there is some other confirmation (such as a hole in the lamp post), the evidence is questionable. I know from experience that often photos do not show what they seem to show. But I'll keep an open mind. --Joe Orman Kimball Corson <kcorson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Joe, But really now, why not? Very low probability events do occur. So infrequently in fact, that assessing their probabilities is extremely hard. Also, given the distance and human reaction times being what they are, I would not have expected the photographer to know what he was photographing at the time. If he did, then I would be more suspicious. A better report afterwards at the scene of what was observable would have been helpful, however. Kimball Corson -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.