Hi Stan, I could be wrong but I thought Meade moved its operation to Mexico a few years back. Not much of a disadvantage over labor costs, maybe not..? -Scott >-----Original Message----- >From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager [mailto:ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:23 AM >To: az-observing digest users >Subject: az-observing Digest V9 #164 > >az-observing Digest Mon, 29 Jun 2009 Volume: 09 Issue: 164 > >In This Issue: > What's Happening to Meade > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:21:45 -0700 >From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: What's Happening to Meade > >In the recent issue of S&T I couldn't help being struck by Meade's >sparsity of ads and the numerous ads that have the banner name >Celestron. Meade has a full page ad for the new six inch ETX-LS for >$1300 and then another 1/4 page ad for some of their other telescopes. >In contrast, there were many ads of retailers showing the Celestron >telescopes. If I were in the market now and a novice I would be >influenced to buy Celestron just because of the number of ads. What's >happening? I know Celestron can also make a good telescope, but what is >causing the sudden (relatively speaking) proliferation of Celestron. I >can see two causes: The Celestron telescope has a higher profit margin >(because they are Chinese telescopes) for retailers and so they are >pushing Celestron, or because of the financial troubles Meade is going >through, maybe there is not enough a supply of their telescopes for >retailers. Any other ideas? Also, do you think Meade has the right >strategy by hanging their hat on the 6" ETX-LS? $1500 for the ACF >version which seems pretty expensive for a 6". >Stan > >------------------------------ > >End of az-observing Digest V9 #164 >********************************** -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.