Hi Don, thanks! I've been thinking of this observation as a sort of work in progress. There are still some proportions in the star field that need adjustment, and so much more I could do to refine the structure in the Milky Way. But I guess I had to stamp it "Rev 1" at some point. :) I prepared the sketch on 9" x 12" Strathmore 70# Drawing paper using 2H and HB graphite for the stars, and a blending stump and kneaded eraser for the Milky Way. After scanning, I inverted the drawing, cleaned up dust & scratches from the scanner glass, and then used Photoshop to color Aldebaran, Capella and Betelgeuse. I've got a more detailed, step-by-step description of it coming out in the Jan 2010 issue of Astronomy Now. (since it's a UK magazine, it tends to show up a few weeks later than normal in US book stores). In other news: Go snow!* Jeremy *no really: "go". :) On Dec 13, 2009, at 2:32 PM, djwrigley@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Jeremy, > I think that is a stunningly accurate depiction of that region of > the sky. Star placement and colors are right on. Photographs that > show the Milky Way in any detail tend to show many more stars than > are actually visible to the naked eye. Outstanding job! > I'd be curious to know what type of materials you used to produce > this image > Don Wrigley -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.