Seriously... Antennas is darker, has a better view of the sky and is not as cold at night.... -----Original Message----- From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of AJ Crayon Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:51 PM To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Weekend While I am out for this week why not consider Antennas? The forecast for Salome the remainder of the week is clear with reasonable highs and lows. AJ Crayon Phoenix, AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Harshaw" <rharshaw2@xxxxxxx> To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Weekend I was thinking about FM for the weekend, but the forecast only showed decent skies Thursday, and to me, a 3 hour drive each way is too much for one night. My plan for now is to do Thursday at Cherry Road and Friday here in Cave Creek in BSO. I think my photon-starved and rabid astro-brother Darrell is planning on FM, he is so desperate. Richard Harshaw Cave Creek, Arizona Brilliant Sky Observatory -----Original Message----- From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Steinberg Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:37 PM To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [AZ-Observing] Weekend The forecasts for Fredericksen meadow seem iffy (T-storms), while the ones for Antennas are clear, dry and not too hot (under 100 anyway and lows in the 70's). Anyone planning to be at Antennas this weekend, particularly Friday? Thanks, Eric -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.