Jimmy, that's cool. If we both had a series of very accurate timings, I think we could calculate the altitude and path of the plane. (Of course we wouldn't really need the Moon). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Ray" <jimmy_ray@xxxxxxx> To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 8:53 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Thank God, Antares is back > Yea, I saw the jet go by but from here it just skimmed the top of the Moon > and as for you caused a bit more excitement that Antares did... > > Jimmy Ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Lind > Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 8:29 PM > To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [AZ-Observing] Thank God, Antares is back > > The reappearance of Antares from behind the moon was ok, but not > spectacular. Gail and I both watched using 6" and 8" dobs, both at 55X. > (Driven scopes at high power would have been better). The event was far > from > ideal. The moon was nearly full and Antares emerged on the bright limb. > Plus, the limb was a wavy mess since it we only 7 degrees above the > horizon. > For us, the best part was when a jet transited the moon. - Paul > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.