At Monday, 13 August 2001, Bob Goff wrote: >I tend to prefer full aperture solar Objective singlet of 10 or more inches >of the plano convev aspheric variety working at f/20 or greater followed by >a heat rejection filter, tilted at about 10 degrees, then a variable field >mask to reject unnecessary heat, then an RG-610 filter for blocking, then a >Schneider Companon enlarging lensthat may be set to any conjugate one >chooses, finally followed by a Lyot-Ohman universally tuneable filter as >described in _Applied_Optics_ in '71 or '72 and either an eyepiece or some >SO film that is a relative of microfile filn and really sensitive to the >red end of the spectrum. Can I get one of them at Starizona for $30? >After about 10,000 hours of Solar observing, I have found that generally >the images deteriorate greatly after about 10 in the morning. I have heard Paul Maxson say the same thing. The bad news, then, is that during the season in low-desert Arizona when it is actually comfortable to be out in the sun, we're stuck with observing it when it is at a low altitude. Tom ================================================================== Sjekk og send epost på: http://mail.kral.no ================================================================== Keen på en diskusjon? eller bare nysjerrig? http://forum.kral.no ================================================================== --- This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. If you wish to be removed from this list, send E-mail to: AZ-Observing-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, with the subject: unsubscribe. The list's archive is at: //www.freelists.org/archives/az-observing This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal messages. Thanks.