>> Comparing this data with seeing forecast models would make an >> interesting, if not useful comparison if this project is ongoing. I confess to not actually look at the CSC or the source models the seeing predictions are derived from while observing last night. I was already pretty busy managing LONEOS (and a very-fast-mover I found) and trying to get some eyeball time outside with the Pronto instead. Certainly the synoptic situation was one where you'd expect good seeing: under the middle of the upper-air ridge, and no local effects disturbing things. Apart from having the real-time measurements, confirmed visually, I think the circumstance is not too uncommon--- perhaps 10 percent of the clear nights at the site are quite similar. Later last night I did try more close pairs, including zeta Boo. But it is now closing to down around 0".65, so in the Pronto it was not any more than "maybe oval", even at 250x(!). I also scanned around looking at galaxies and various open and globular clusters, so it was a pleasant bit of viewing for me. \Brian -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.