Peter, ah ha! There it is - on the side of back page:) It reads 21.56. Thanks for the heads up for me to open eyes. I'll put that in the mix with= the others. Probably list average of all readings during the night rather= than list each one individually with the time taken. Clear skies, aj ---- Peter Argenziano <pargenz@xxxxxxx> wrote:=20 > From the FWIW department, I took SQM readings at the AAMM at one hour=20 > intervals from 04:00 UT to 08:00 UT Saturday (the night before the=20 > 'official' marathon). All readings were taken from the same location: N32= =C2=B0=20 > 27.673', W111=C2=B0 43.843', Elevation 1,716 ft. >=20 > 04:00 UT - 21.38 > 05:00 UT - 21.45 > 06:00 UT - 21.52 > 07:00 UT - 21.53 > 08:00 UT - 21.55 >=20 > Each of these readings was actually an average of three consecutive=20 > readings. >=20 > I didn't take any further readings that night because I became engrossed= =20 > with galaxies in Canes Venatici (especially the interacting pair known as= =20 > Arp 269 or NGC4485/4490). > I took one reading on Marathon night, around 07:00 UT, but apparently onl= y=20 > noted it on my Messier checklist because it isn't in any notes I can find= =20 > here. ;-) >=20 > Peter >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx> > To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Brian Skiff" <bas@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:49 PM > Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Some thoughts on the AAMM >=20 >=20 > Brian, all I can say is the recording was on the back page of his check l= ist=20 > just below M30. So my guess is 5:00AM MST, mainly because M30 rose a rou= nd=20 > that time. Jim came over to speak with me when many of the lists were= =20 > being turned in. Unfortunately I didn't get much chance to ask questions= . >=20 > Clear skies, > aj >=20 >=20 > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please= =20 > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.