As I've mentioned on this list previously, I've been making measurements with one of the SQM sky-brightness meters over the last several weeks. Last night at Anderson Mesa was what I would call a 'typical' dry-season photometric night strictly from the visual impression. The SQM numbers were also as consistent as one could expect from a simple device like this: UT Date hhmm LST site mu pv dp remarks (mm) (C) 20051006 0300 2030 Mesa 21.38 9 -3 20051006 0400 2130 Mesa 21.39 9 -3 20051006 0500 2230 Mesa 21.39 9 -2 20051006 0600 2330 Mesa 21.40 9 -3 20051006 0700 0030 Mesa 21.39 9 -3 20051006 0800 0130 Mesa 21.37 9 -3 20051006 0900 0230 Mesa 21.40 9 -4 20051006 1000 0330 Mesa 21.40 9 -2 20051006 1100 0430 Mesa 21.41 9 -2 pv = 6mm at 12h UT ...where the 'mu' value is the SQM reading in magnitudes per square arcsecond. Rough modelling indicates this 'all-sky' value is about 0.3 mag brighter than one would measure for a small star-free spot at the zenith in the V band. The total-column precipitable water-vapor dropped from 9mm for the 5pm sounding to 6mm in the 5am sounding; local dew-point was pretty stable. I've also mentioned in the past getting these particularly inspiring short views of the sky from an open area not far from the telescope compound. I stopped at this spot this morning (about 4:45a) and the overall view of the sky was similar, trending in me to basic stupefaction (to quote the old Firesign Theatre bit: "I was seized by a transport of scientific rapture"), with blazing bright zodiacal light in Leo and Cancer, winter Milky Way, windless dead silence, etc etc. Obviously this is largely psychological, but now I have numbers to go with it! \Brian P.S.: A reminder that the nightly cloudiness and sky-brightness data are tabluated at the Lowell Web site starting at: http://www.lowell.edu/cgi-bin/www/clouds/clouds.cgi -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.