I don't think you could go wrong with either, but if I had to pick one or the other it'd be the Skywatcher due to the FPL-53 glass. Better color correction according to the guys at Cloudy Nights. Peter's suggestion of his Celestron is good as well, I think it's lighter than the two you listed and uses FPL-53. Only draw back is a rack & pinion focuser if I remember right. Those dual speed Crayfords seem to make lots of people happy when astro-photoing (new word I just made up). I have a Vxen ed80sf with a single speed Crayford which is real nice, but it's in a 100mm tube which might make it bulky and hard to balance when mounting on your SCT. Just some thoughts, Chuck Shields Quoting Bill VanOrden <beevo1@xxxxxxx>: > Hello Group, > > I am in the process of making a change to my scope setup. I have a 10" SCT > on an Atlas mounting with an Orion Short Tube 80 as an auxiliary > scope/finder/camera lens. I find the FL of the ST80 a bit short for what I > ultimately want. I plan on using the refractor as a wide field viewer, > finder scope and camera lens with my Canon DSLR. My biggest issues with the > ST80 is the fringing (reduced nicely with the Minus Violet filter from > Lumicon) and the soft focus when used photographically. It has to have a 2" > focuser, I would like to keep the costs under $900 or so if buying new, have > no aversion to good used stuff. > > http://www.skywatchertelescope.net/Equinox.html > > http://www.williamoptics.com/wo_shop/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=21_23&pr > oducts_id=218 > > Anyone have any thoughts on these two scopes? > > Thoughts on something else? > > Beevo (aka Bill VanOrden) > > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.