[AZ-Observing] Re: Refinery near Sentinel?
- From: "Workman, Brian (AZ76)" <brian.workman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:10:05 -0700
Except that it explicitly says "Yuma County". Gila Bend is in Maricopa
county; Nogales is in Santa Cruz, and no part of 85 extends into Yuma
county.
If they place it very close to Yuma itself, they can run the pipeline around
the West end of the gunnery range without crossing it. They'll also be able
to draw on a labor pool based in Yuma itself. So my guess is that's where
they're talking about.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones, Jack (AZ75) [mailto:jack.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: 'az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Refinery near Sentinel?
>
>
> It could end up south of Gila Bend along 85 or near Nogales
> since they plan
> to pipe in crude from Mexico and I don't think they want to
> run that across
> the gunnery range.
>
> Jack
>
> >
> > >All,
> > >
> > >A quote from a front page story in today's The Arizona
> > Republic, "Refinery
> > >backers bow out of Mobile,
> > >look near Yuma":
> > >
> > >"A location has not yet been picked, but he said it would
> be located
> > >somewhere along the Interstate 8 corridor, where there are good
> > >transportation links."
> > >
> > >The paper has a map indicating I-8 East of the Yuma area.
> > Our wise governor
> > >Janet suggested this location: "the governor questioned why
> > refinery backers
> > >aren't looking hard at options in Yuma County.
> > >
> > >See the story at the link below:
> > >
> > >http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/1031re
> > finery31.html
> > >Warning: the site may ask a 3 question poll before taking
> > you to the link.
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or
> unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
