Tim, Good info to know. Thanks. Stan On 3/17/2015 10:34 AM, Tim Jones wrote: > In reality, the best rule of thumb is to assume 1/4 the time listed by the > manufacturer since the laptop will only see times like they advertise if > you’re doing simple tasks like watching a video, browsing the web, working in > Word where the CPU is able to throttle down, the memory clock is slowed to a > crawl, and you’re apps only use the low-end graphics chipset. If you’re > running an astronomy app or database-based app, the level of disk I/O and > graphics use will draw that number down to around 3.5hours. > > My fully loaded Mac Book Pro Retina (i7, 3.2GHz), is claimed to have a 8 hour > battery life. In reality, I’m lucky to get 2 hours because of the way that I > use it. > > Tim > > >> On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Stan Gorodenski<stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> p.s., If this really does get up to 12.8 hours on a charge, you might >> wonder what my concern is. I think I mentioned I will be out in the >> field for an extended period of time, about 2 weeks at a time. >> Stan >> >> On 3/17/2015 8:45 AM, Stan Gorodenski wrote: >> >>> Dwight, >>> You are correct about not needing a super computer to do astronomy in >>> the field. I bought this for other reasons besides astronomy. Although I >>> have never tried seeing how long it will run on the battery alone, the >>> ad in B&H when I bought it says it has "9-Cell Lithium-ion providing up >>> to 12.8 hours per charge (94Wh)", whatever 94Wh means. The battery is >>> sort of an odd design. It sticks out about an inch beyond the laptop, I >>> guess to fit in all the 9 lithium cells. >>> Stan >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please >> send personal replies to the author, not the list. >> >> > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > > > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.