Hi Stan, Richard is correct, it takes some time to "tweek" the alignment, and it's best done over several nights. I don't think it's anything physical-celestial, I think it's more how the brain detects the small errors while performing the alignment. Do an adjustment in both axes, sleep on it and go again later. I did the same thing at my observatory over several nights, even weeks and now, I can track an object all day or all night. I've done this with the Sun, so I know. Just stay with it for a few sessions and it'll be worth it. Steve Dodder Chairman, SAC Novice Group Coordinator, Grand Canyon Star Party, North Rim Director, Stone Haven Observatory fester00@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.stargazing.net/Astroman > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:41:59 -0700 > From: stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Polar Alignment > > Thanks, Richard. It is interesting that it requires more than one night, > in your case five. I wonder what the physical-celestial basis of this > could be. > Stan > > On 3/14/2010 10:15 PM, Richard Harshaw wrote: > > I used the drift method to set the pier for my observatory, Stan, and used > > an illuminated reticule to do it. I made tests over five different nights, > > each one running about 30 minutes. After 4 nights, I was only getting about > > 2 min of creep in 30 minutes, and by the end of the 5th night, the star > > stayed centered all during the half hour run. > > > > IMHO, I think it is best to repeat the drift test 10 to 20 times before > > saying you are even close to being polar aligned. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1 -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.