[AZ-Observing] Re: [OT] over-quoting issue, was - Re: 3,000 images -- 3,000 words

  • From: Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx>
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:37:26 -0700

Hey that's great! Good luck with that.

Jack (no relation) Jones

Tim Jones wrote:

> Nope :-) - that's just the way an email should be handled.  Note that  

> of my reply is easy to follow.  Remember, not everyone has read the  

> excess content keeps the thread flowing and helps lessen confusion.
> 
>> What yer missing is that the over-quote limit is set ridiculously  

>> long. It was arbitrarily set at that level in the beginning and was  

>> in the past, but always dropped after all the whining stopped, as  

>> be less noticeable in the future.
> 
> But, if you voluntarily trim the excess fat off your posts, the limit  

> reply to the reply to the original poster 8-).
> 
> Also note that the trimming of the post results in a message that is  

> 
> something completely different...
> 
> Tim
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. az-observing
  3. Archive
  4. 11-2009