[AZ-Observing] Re: Nexstar - Alternative?

  • From: Greg Schwimer <schwim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:49:29 -0700

Yup, and its raining out right now. On Feb 28, 2015 5:40 PM, 
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> So your the one!  arrrgggghhhhh 
>
>
> In a message dated 2/28/2015 5:15:05 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
> schwim@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: 
> I agree  as well. I recently got into all of this about 4 months ago, 
> around when we  started having cloudy nights all the time. I went with a 10" 
> dob, 
> and have  been amazed at what I've learned about the sky as well as what I 
> am able to  see even under the light dome. 
> In comparison, I later acquired a c8 OTA  and mounted it to an ioptron 
> zeq25 goto mount. Let me tell you, I can get up  and running way faster with 
> the 
> dob, and learn way more using it than the  goto. The goto is a lot more 
> work, and you learn more about the equipment than  the sky. 
>
> My $2e-02. 
>
> .Greg 
>
> On Feb 28, 2015 4:49 PM, Dan  Heim <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > 
> > I'll second Eric's  recommendation. More bang for the buck with a Dob. 
> > And a 10" is  easily manageable. I don't think beginners should get a 
> > go-to as a  way to "learn" astronomy. A Dob & a planisphere works fine. 
> > First  time I saw the satellites of M31 was through a 10" Dob.  -Dan Heim 
>
> > On 2/28/2015 4:33 PM, Eric Steinberg wrote: 
> > > For what  it's worth, if they would like to take the time to learn the 
> sky, a 10" manual  dob can be gotten for half the price (one with 
> tracking/goto for around the  same price) that has almost twice the area of 
> the 8" and 
> can provide beautiful  and satisfying views of a lot more objects.  It's a 
> different kind of  experience, and a little more to lug around, though not 
> all that much  more.  Might be worth considering... 
> > > 
> > > Eric  
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message----- 
> > > From:  az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Stan Gorodenski 
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015  4:18 PM 
> > > To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > Subject:  [AZ-Observing] Re: Nexstar - Alternative? 
> > > 
> > > Thanks  Rob and David. I just talked to my friend and he were wondering 
> if there is  another make telescope of similar optical design with the same 
> features, i.e.,  goto, of equal optical quality for about the same price. I 
> am not into this  and so the only thing I could think of is the Vixen, but 
> Vixens seem to be  more expensive. 
> > > Stan 
> > >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > See message header for info on  list archives or unsubscribing, and 
> please 
> > send personal replies to  the author, not the list. 
> > 
> -- 
> See message header for info on  list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
> send personal replies to the  author, not the list. 
>
>
>
> -- 
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
> send personal replies to the author, not the list. 
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: