Actually I think you may have observed 7464 and have recorded it in your drawing. If you look at 7463, you will notice it extends a little out toward 7465 after the bright nucleus oval. You may have mistaken 7464 for the fuzziness a little further on! You either drew it as nebulosity or thought there was a smudge there. Or maybe it IS a smudge? Anyway, what a great drawing. In my Deep Space CCD Atlas North (Vickers), it is a small round fuzzy dot of an elliptical GX in that spot and is prob, the reason for the difficulty in observing it. I "don't like" tiny planetaries for the same reason: they look like stars. Check into this book; I use the CCD Atlas all the time to check what I see and settle arguments with myself and others. Jack Jones Saguaro Astronomy Club Lunar List Awards and Messier Marathon Co-coordinator Phoenix AZ spicastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I have not observed NGC 7464 with the 10-inch. Hewitt-White describes this > stellar metropolis as having a visual magnitude of 13.3 and a diameter of 0.5 > arcminute. That translates to a surface brightness of 20.4 magnitude per > square > arcsecond, which is quite bright. I should have seen this object in the > 10-inch > and did devote some time to the task. However, it eluded me. > > Has anyone on this list observed NGC 7464 with small or moderate aperture? > Would you mind sharing your notes? > > Regards, > > Bill Ferris > "Cosmic Voyage: The Online Resource for Amateur Astronomers" > URL: http://www.cosmic-voyage.net > -- This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. See this message's header if you want info about unsubscribing or the list's archive. This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal messages. Thanks.