[AZ-Observing] Re: Meade

  • From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:17:01 -0700

Dick,
You stated exactly my concerns. You worded it a lot better than I did in 
one of my previous messages.
Stan

rharshaw2@xxxxxxx wrote:

>Darrel, in a sense I agree with you, but in another I have to lay the blame 
>for Meade's woes (and Celestron's, etc.) at the feet of the typical American 
>consumer. We as a people more and more demand cheaper and cheaper products 
>with higher and higher quality and that is possible up to an extent-- but we 
>may have reached that limit with mass-produced telescopes. The bottom line 
>becomes that a hobbyist whose first concern is the cost of the hobby may in 
>fact be doing himself/herself more harm in the long haul (by driving out high 
>quality companies that cannot compete on price alone) and leaving us with 
>cheap mass sources of just mediocre quality.  It may well be that ours will be 
>the last generation to see textbook Airy discs in a telescope. Hoo boy, sigh!
>
>Dick H
>  
>
>  
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: