Dick, You stated exactly my concerns. You worded it a lot better than I did in one of my previous messages. Stan rharshaw2@xxxxxxx wrote: >Darrel, in a sense I agree with you, but in another I have to lay the blame >for Meade's woes (and Celestron's, etc.) at the feet of the typical American >consumer. We as a people more and more demand cheaper and cheaper products >with higher and higher quality and that is possible up to an extent-- but we >may have reached that limit with mass-produced telescopes. The bottom line >becomes that a hobbyist whose first concern is the cost of the hobby may in >fact be doing himself/herself more harm in the long haul (by driving out high >quality companies that cannot compete on price alone) and leaving us with >cheap mass sources of just mediocre quality. It may well be that ours will be >the last generation to see textbook Airy discs in a telescope. Hoo boy, sigh! > >Dick H > > > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.