I was kind of surprised just how short of an exposure was required. I keep
seeing all of these images in the magazines that take minutes/hours/days to
expose. So I started out in the 1-2 second range. Kept getting this bright
fuzzy image. Kept thinking my focus was off. But no, it was just way over
exposed. Tried 1/30 on a lark and that came out looking something like what I
was hoping for.
It’s going to take some time to get a feel for what exposure is needed for what
objects. And for how to use all my thrown together bits.
Michael McDonald
mikemac@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:16 AM, David Douglass <dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I’d say you are up and working.
Looks like Saturn to me !!
David Douglass
David@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (main)
Dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alternate)
Cell (602) 908-9092
On 6/4/16, 1:07 AM, "Michael McDonald" <az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on
behalf of mikemac@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
www.mikemac.com/IMG_0024.jpg
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
