Dean - Thank you for sharing your great photos and interpretation of same. Cheers, Geoff -- ketelsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi All- Early this month I was able to arrange a trip to the LBT observatory on = Mt Graham with project scientist John Hill. His reason for going up was to= give a tour to the docents from Safford's Discovery Park science center.= = Currently it looks like: http://alice.as.arizona.edu/~ketelsen/LBT0508sm.jpg You can see instrument scientist Ray Bertram working on the red prime focus filter wheel at left. Access to the prime instruments means ridin= g up a swaying sissors lift up nearly 30 feet, which doesn't look like ver= y much fun from the floor. Scattered around are various tour takers. = They've installed covers near the hydrostatic bearings in the 11 months since I've been there - the floor was a LOT less oily than last time! My reason for going up was to take a night-time animated GIF sequence fr= om inside the dome. I had already tried a year ago, but a fast-moving snowstorm killed the attempt that night, though I picked what lens to u= se (Canon 10-22 zoom at 10mm and f/3.5) and I got a sequence of the scope moving from zenith to horizon: http://alice.as.arizona.edu/~ketelsen/LBTw10mm.gif This time some thin clouds threatened, but it cleared after sunset and I= got this: http://alice.as.arizona.edu/~ketelsen/LBT.gif It looks pretty confusing, but is really sort of neat. The individual frames are 6 minutes, and I've not had time to do anything with them - n= ot even dark subtraction, but at nearly freezing, there really aren't any h= ot pixels that stand out. The frames that show the light pollution is from= Fort Grant when the scope is pointed towards the south. Don't forget th= at the building tracks with the telescope, but is only accurate at the elevation where the telescope is looking. That is why the stars trail i= n the sequence - the telescope isn't pointed in that direction... Also, t= he stars appear to trail in opposite directions when pointed north or south= (don't forget I'm looking out the dome in the opposite direction of the scope). The observer was doing REALLY short exposures of bright galaxie= s (like M81, M82, M65, etc) and resolving stars, looking for cepheid variables. Just this morning I've asked for some subframes to post - th= ey were really looking great - but the longest they could expose on M81 was= 60 seconds! Hope you enjoy! -Dean -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and pleas= e = send personal replies to the author, not the list. ____________________________________________________________ Click here to find an affordable personal injury lawyer that you trust. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/Ioyw6iiginJ3XoTo8Rq5CDAABtfT= HrKyZvU8hNV2JbbtHpDu9HLlFv/ -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.