[AZ-Observing] Re: IC 1296
- From: "Paul Lind" <pulind@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:21:10 -0700
I agree with Jack. I was set up next to him and looked for IC 1296 in his
20 and in my 14-1/2. This object is definitely not a piece of cake. I
think Steve was just messing around with us.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Jones" <Telescoper@xxxxxxx>
To: "AZ Observing List" <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 9:04 PM
Subject: [AZ-Observing] IC 1296
> IC 1296 is a real challenge object and those back East have tussled with
> it
> lately, calling it impossible or glimpsed in very large aperture in good
> seeing only. Dave Kriege sees it with a video camera but not visually in
> his
> 25". Arizona clear dark skies help a lot. Bill Ferris sees it in his 18"
> at
> 7000 ft. Both Peter and I saw it in our 25 and 20" scopes Sat night at
> Antenna site. Steve Coe saw it immediately in my scope before any of us
> eventually got a handle on it, but I don't know if he was kidding or not.
> He
> centered it and described it, like it was a piece of cake. It may be that
> he
> has tracked it down in the past and knew what to look for.
>
> IC 1296 is 4' WNW of M57 (p.a. 303). Argo Navis reports it as 15.1 with a
> surface brightness of 15.2. Luginbuhl & Skiff (p 165) has it at mag 'z'
> 15.4
> (taken from CGCG). Megastar shows it as 14.8 (p). Uranometria doesn't show
> it
> inthe first edition, but the 2nd edition shows it as a pimple on the edge
> of
> M57. It is not in the SAC database. It has a very easily recognizable
> asterism
> to help confirm it: it is inside a hexagon of stars with a star in the
> center
> right next to it, so the location can be positively known. It's just a
> matter
> of waiting (camping), and then you either see it or you don't.
>
> Jack
>
>
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
